Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Quick answer: Citizenship by investment (CBI) is a legal process by which a country grants full citizenship — passport included — in exchange for a qualifying economic contribution, typically a government donation from US$200,000 or approved real estate from US$200,000–US$400,000, after strict due diligence. Around a dozen countries operate CBI programmes in 2026.
CBI is naturalisation on economic grounds, established by statute. Unlike residence programmes, it grants the passport directly — usually within months and without relocation, language tests or residence requirements.

St Kitts & Nevis pioneered CBI in 1984. The modern industry took shape after 2009 as visa-waiver agreements made Caribbean passports genuinely useful; today the sector channels billions annually into small-state budgets, funding infrastructure, healthcare and climate resilience.
Caribbean: St Kitts & Nevis, Dominica, Grenada, Antigua & Barbuda, St Lucia. Europe-adjacent: Türkiye, North Macedonia (by economic interest). Pacific: Vanuatu, Nauru. Middle East/Africa: Egypt, Jordan, São Tomé & Príncipe. Each differs in price, timeline and passport strength — see our program comparison.

Entry points: Vanuatu US$130,000 (2–3 months), Dominica and St Lucia from US$200,000 donations, Grenada US$235,000, St Kitts US$250,000, Türkiye US$400,000 real estate (4–8 months). All-in costs add due diligence, processing and advisory fees — typically 15–25% above the headline.
CBI suits investors who need mobility and optionality now: frequent travellers with restrictive passports, families seeking security, and entrepreneurs positioning for treaty benefits like the US E-2 (via Grenada or Türkiye).
Yes — every programme we work with is created by national legislation and administered by government units. See our dedicated legality guide.
No. Caribbean and Vanuatu programmes have no residence requirement. Türkiye requires none either; you simply maintain the qualifying investment for its holding period.
Yes — spouses and dependent children are included in all major programmes; several also admit dependent parents and, in some cases, siblings.
CBI grants citizenship immediately; a golden visa grants residence that may lead to citizenship after 5–10 years of naturalisation rules.
Get a confidential, no-obligation assessment of your eligibility, budget and timeline from our investment migration specialists.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “FAQPage”, “mainEntity”: [{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Is citizenship by investment legal?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Yes u2014 every programme we work with is created by national legislation and administered by government units. See our dedicated legality guide.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Do I have to live in the country?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “No. Caribbean and Vanuatu programmes have no residence requirement. Tu00fcrkiye requires none either; you simply maintain the qualifying investment for its holding period.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Can my family get citizenship too?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Yes u2014 spouses and dependent children are included in all major programmes; several also admit dependent parents and, in some cases, siblings.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What’s the difference between CBI and a golden visa?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “CBI grants citizenship immediately; a golden visa grants residence that may lead to citizenship after 5u201310 years of naturalisation rules.”}}]}{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “BreadcrumbList”, “itemListElement”: [{“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 1, “name”: “Home”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/”}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 2, “name”: “What Is Citizenship by Investment? Definition, Costs & Programs”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/what-is-citizenship-by-investment/”}]}
The reference section below extends this article with the market-wide data, costs, process and answers our readers ask for most — maintained by the Global Citizenship HQ research desk and updated as programmes change.
One pattern from a decade of client files deserves emphasis: preparation time is the only variable applicants fully control. Government queues are what they are; document assembly, source-of-funds evidence and name-consistency work happen entirely on your side of the table. Files that invest six careful weeks before submission routinely finish months ahead of files that rushed to file and then fed deficiency letters for a year.
Every application in this field runs on the same documentary spine — assembled early, it is the single biggest determinant of your timeline:
The preparation standard that separates fast files from stalled ones: every name, date and address rendered identically across every document, validity windows mapped so nothing expires mid-process, and certified translations from recognised translators only.
Zoom out once before deciding anything: second citizenships and residence permits are decade-scale assets. Programme details will shift — prices ratchet upward, routes open and close, requirements tighten — but the strategic logic holds: jurisdictional diversification, acquired early and maintained compliantly, has outperformed waiting in every year this industry has existed.
To place the topic above in market context, here is the current landscape at a glance — figures verified against official programme publications for 2026:
| Program | Minimum investment | Timeline | Visa-free access | Residence req. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Kitts & Nevis | US$250,000 (SISC donation) or US$325,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈150 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Dominica | US$200,000 (EDF donation) or US$200,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈143 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Grenada | US$235,000 (NTF donation) or US$270,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈146 incl. China; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Antigua & Barbuda | US$230,000 (NDF, family of 4) | 4–6 months | ≈147 destinations | 5 days in 5 years |
| St Lucia | US$240,000 donation or US$300,000 bond | 4–8 months | ≈145 destinations | None |
| Türkiye | US$400,000 real estate or US$500,000 deposit | 4–8 months | ≈110; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Vanuatu | US$130,000 (DSP) | 2–3 months | ≈95 (EU access suspended) | None |
| Egypt | US$250,000 donation | 6–12 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Nauru | US$105,000 contribution | 3–4 months | ≈89 destinations | None |
| São Tomé & Príncipe | ≈US$90,000 contribution | 4–6 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Cambodia | US$245,000 donation / US$305,000 investment | 3–6 months | ≈54 destinations | None |
| Jordan | US$750,000+ investment | 6–9 months | ≈55 destinations | None |
Whatever route this article points you toward, the cost anatomy is consistent across the industry — and the headline figure is never the whole story:
| Cost component | Typical range | When paid | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government contribution / investment | US$90,000–US$800,000+ | After approval-in-principle | The headline figure; donation is consumed, property/bonds recoverable |
| Due diligence fees | US$7,500–US$15,000 per adult | At filing | Non-refundable; funds international background checks |
| Government processing fees | US$250–US$10,000 per person | At filing / approval | Varies sharply by programme and dependent count |
| Professional / legal fees | US$15,000–US$50,000 per family | Staged | File preparation, compliance, submission, post-approval support |
| Document costs | US$1,000–US$5,000 | Preparation phase | Apostilles, sworn translations, police certificates, courier |
| Passport & certificate fees | US$350–US$1,500 per person | After approval | Biometrics, issuance, oath administration where applicable |
| Property transaction costs (if applicable) | 4–10% of price | At closing | Transfer taxes, registration, agent commissions |
Rule of thumb across the industry: budget 15–25% above the headline contribution for a realistic all-in figure, and require an itemised fee schedule in writing before engaging any advisor.
Context worth holding while you compare options: investment migration is a treaty product. A passport’s value lives in the visa-waiver agreements behind it, and those agreements survive only where screening is credible. The programmes covered across our guides maintain their access precisely because refusals are real, interviews are standard, and information flows to partner governments — inconvenient for fraudsters, invaluable for legitimate families.
From first consultation to passport or permit in hand, well-run applications follow a predictable arc:
If this topic touches your own plans, the efficient next step is a structured conversation: our specialists compare every programme mentioned here against your circumstances, produce a costed shortlist, and — when you proceed — prepare the file to the zero-deficiency standard that keeps timelines at the fast end of every range.
It helps to remember what these statuses are legally: citizenship is a relationship with a state that survives governments, marriages and market cycles; residence is a renewable licence with conditions. Both are valuable; only one is permanent. Pricing that difference correctly — rather than by sticker — is the core skill of this field.
The pace of change is itself a planning input. Recent seasons alone delivered:
None of these changes stripped status from anyone who already held it. All of them repriced or restricted what later applicants could buy — the asymmetry that defines timing in this field.
A decision framework that resolves most cases in one sitting: start from the outcome, not the programme. If you need a stronger passport within a year, direct citizenship by investment is the only product that delivers — shortlist by your actual destinations, then by family policy, then by route economics. If your goal is an eventual EU passport, buy the residence programme whose naturalisation clock you will genuinely satisfy — Portugal for minimal presence, Greece for property-led patience. If the objective is tax, choose the residence jurisdiction first (UAE, Italy’s flat tax, Greece’s non-dom, territorial systems) and let citizenship ride separately.
Then run the constraint check: dual-citizenship legality for your current nationality, military-service exposure for sons, source-of-funds documentability, and the honest presence question — how many days will your life actually allow where? Programmes fail families most often not on approval but on fit: the absentee who bought a residence-heavy route, the relocator who bought an absentee product. Match the instrument to the life, and the rest is paperwork.
| Mobility tier | Representative passports | Approx. visa-free reach | How investors access the tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Global elite | Singapore, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Spain | 190–195 destinations | Naturalisation after residence programmes (Portugal 5 yrs is the engineered path) or ancestry claims |
| Tier 2 — Strong Western | UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand | 184–189 | Skilled migration, EB-5 (US$800k), NZ Active Investor Plus, then naturalisation |
| Tier 3 — Premium CBI | St Kitts & Nevis, Antigua, Grenada, St Lucia, Dominica | 143–150 incl. Schengen & UK | Direct purchase: US$200,000–250,000, 4–6 months |
| Tier 4 — Regional powers | Türkiye, and rising climbers like the UAE | 110–183 | Türkiye US$400k CBI; UAE citizenship not sold — 10-yr Golden Visa instead |
| Tier 5 — Budget documents | Vanuatu, Nauru, São Tomé, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan | 54–95 | US$90,000–250,000; plan-B and regional value, not Europe access |
The tier logic explains most pricing in this industry: you are buying treaty networks. Moving up one tier is what the investment actually purchases; comparing programmes within a tier is where family policy, speed and route options decide.
On evidence standards: everything quantitative in this article traces to official programme publications, government fee schedules and primary legislation, reviewed after each legislative season. Where programmes change faster than publication cycles — and in this market they do — the direction of error is flagged rather than smoothed over.