Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Quick answer: Our publications desk distils the investment-migration industry into actionable intelligence: programme comparison reports, passport and residence indexes, pricing trackers and legal updates β free to serious investors.

Country-by-country analysis lives in our Citizenship by Investment ultimate guide and Residence by Investment hub β each programme page covers investment options, costs, timelines, documents and FAQs.
Recent shifts we track: the ECJ ruling ending Maltas investor citizenship (April 2025), Spains golden-visa termination (April 2025), the Caribbean US$200,000 price floor, Portugals fund-only rules, and the UAEs expanding Golden Visa categories. Subscribers receive change alerts before they hit the mainstream press.

Index pages and market updates are free; bespoke comparative briefings for client mandates are part of advisory engagements.
Quarterly, and immediately after material legal changes in any covered programme.
Yes β clients receive tailored comparisons matched to nationality, budget and objectives.
Every programme datum traces to statutes, government gazettes or official unit publications.
Get a confidential, no-obligation assessment of your eligibility, budget and timeline from our investment migration specialists.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “FAQPage”, “mainEntity”: [{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Are the reports free?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Index pages and market updates are free; bespoke comparative briefings for client mandates are part of advisory engagements.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How often are indexes updated?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Quarterly, and immediately after material legal changes in any covered programme.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Can I request a custom report?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Yes u2014 clients receive tailored comparisons matched to nationality, budget and objectives.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Do you cite official sources?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Every programme datum traces to statutes, government gazettes or official unit publications.”}}]}{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “BreadcrumbList”, “itemListElement”: [{“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 1, “name”: “Home”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/”}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 2, “name”: “Publications & Reports: Investment Migration Intelligence”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/publications-and-reports/”}]}
The reference section below extends this article with the market-wide data, costs, process and answers our readers ask for most β maintained by the Global Citizenship HQ research desk and updated as programmes change.
The regulatory backdrop matters to every decision on this page: since the 2024 Caribbean MOU established shared due-diligence standards and a US$200,000 price floor, and the European Court of Justice ended intra-EU citizenship sales in 2025, the market has consolidated around fewer, better-governed programmes. That consolidation is the buyer’s friend β surviving programmes defend their treaties vigorously because their entire value depends on them.
Every application in this field runs on the same documentary spine β assembled early, it is the single biggest determinant of your timeline:
The preparation standard that separates fast files from stalled ones: every name, date and address rendered identically across every document, validity windows mapped so nothing expires mid-process, and certified translations from recognised translators only.
A planning principle that applies across every scenario above: sequence beats selection. The families with the best outcomes rarely found secret programmes β they executed ordinary ones in the right order: fast citizenship for immediate optionality, residence permits matched to actual living intentions, tax residency moved deliberately before liquidity events, and every dependent included at the cheapest possible moment.
To place the topic above in market context, here is the current landscape at a glance β figures verified against official programme publications for 2026:
| Program | Minimum investment | Timeline | Visa-free access | Residence req. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Kitts & Nevis | US$250,000 (SISC donation) or US$325,000+ real estate | 4β6 months | β150 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Dominica | US$200,000 (EDF donation) or US$200,000+ real estate | 4β6 months | β143 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Grenada | US$235,000 (NTF donation) or US$270,000+ real estate | 4β6 months | β146 incl. China; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Antigua & Barbuda | US$230,000 (NDF, family of 4) | 4β6 months | β147 destinations | 5 days in 5 years |
| St Lucia | US$240,000 donation or US$300,000 bond | 4β8 months | β145 destinations | None |
| TΓΌrkiye | US$400,000 real estate or US$500,000 deposit | 4β8 months | β110; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Vanuatu | US$130,000 (DSP) | 2β3 months | β95 (EU access suspended) | None |
| Egypt | US$250,000 donation | 6β12 months | β70 destinations | None |
| Nauru | US$105,000 contribution | 3β4 months | β89 destinations | None |
| SΓ£o TomΓ© & PrΓncipe | βUS$90,000 contribution | 4β6 months | β70 destinations | None |
| Cambodia | US$245,000 donation / US$305,000 investment | 3β6 months | β54 destinations | None |
| Jordan | US$750,000+ investment | 6β9 months | β55 destinations | None |
Whatever route this article points you toward, the cost anatomy is consistent across the industry β and the headline figure is never the whole story:
| Cost component | Typical range | When paid | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government contribution / investment | US$90,000βUS$800,000+ | After approval-in-principle | The headline figure; donation is consumed, property/bonds recoverable |
| Due diligence fees | US$7,500βUS$15,000 per adult | At filing | Non-refundable; funds international background checks |
| Government processing fees | US$250βUS$10,000 per person | At filing / approval | Varies sharply by programme and dependent count |
| Professional / legal fees | US$15,000βUS$50,000 per family | Staged | File preparation, compliance, submission, post-approval support |
| Document costs | US$1,000βUS$5,000 | Preparation phase | Apostilles, sworn translations, police certificates, courier |
| Passport & certificate fees | US$350βUS$1,500 per person | After approval | Biometrics, issuance, oath administration where applicable |
| Property transaction costs (if applicable) | 4β10% of price | At closing | Transfer taxes, registration, agent commissions |
Rule of thumb across the industry: budget 15β25% above the headline contribution for a realistic all-in figure, and require an itemised fee schedule in writing before engaging any advisor.
The independence note that shapes our coverage: Global Citizenship HQ maintains programme data from primary sources β statutes, government gazettes and official fee schedules β and updates after every legislative change. Rankings and comparisons follow published methodology; where commercial relationships exist with programmes or developers, they never alter an editorial conclusion.
From first consultation to passport or permit in hand, well-run applications follow a predictable arc:
Where our advisory desk fits: we run exactly this analysis against your specific passport, family and objectives β modelling the realistic all-in costs, flagging profile complications before they meet a due-diligence analyst, and managing authorised submission end-to-end. The first consultation is free, confidential and obligation-free.
Reading across the whole market rather than one programme at a time changes conclusions surprisingly often. Families who arrive certain they want a specific passport frequently leave with a two-instrument structure β a fast citizenship for permanence and a residence permit for lifestyle β because the combined cost of the right pair often undercuts forcing one product to do both jobs badly.
| Mobility tier | Representative passports | Approx. visa-free reach | How investors access the tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 β Global elite | Singapore, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Spain | 190β195 destinations | Naturalisation after residence programmes (Portugal 5 yrs is the engineered path) or ancestry claims |
| Tier 2 β Strong Western | UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand | 184β189 | Skilled migration, EB-5 (US$800k), NZ Active Investor Plus, then naturalisation |
| Tier 3 β Premium CBI | St Kitts & Nevis, Antigua, Grenada, St Lucia, Dominica | 143β150 incl. Schengen & UK | Direct purchase: US$200,000β250,000, 4β6 months |
| Tier 4 β Regional powers | TΓΌrkiye, and rising climbers like the UAE | 110β183 | TΓΌrkiye US$400k CBI; UAE citizenship not sold β 10-yr Golden Visa instead |
| Tier 5 β Budget documents | Vanuatu, Nauru, SΓ£o TomΓ©, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan | 54β95 | US$90,000β250,000; plan-B and regional value, not Europe access |
The tier logic explains most pricing in this industry: you are buying treaty networks. Moving up one tier is what the investment actually purchases; comparing programmes within a tier is where family policy, speed and route options decide.
The pace of change is itself a planning input. Recent seasons alone delivered:
None of these changes stripped status from anyone who already held it. All of them repriced or restricted what later applicants could buy β the asymmetry that defines timing in this field.
A decision framework that resolves most cases in one sitting: start from the outcome, not the programme. If you need a stronger passport within a year, direct citizenship by investment is the only product that delivers β shortlist by your actual destinations, then by family policy, then by route economics. If your goal is an eventual EU passport, buy the residence programme whose naturalisation clock you will genuinely satisfy β Portugal for minimal presence, Greece for property-led patience. If the objective is tax, choose the residence jurisdiction first (UAE, Italy’s flat tax, Greece’s non-dom, territorial systems) and let citizenship ride separately.
Then run the constraint check: dual-citizenship legality for your current nationality, military-service exposure for sons, source-of-funds documentability, and the honest presence question β how many days will your life actually allow where? Programmes fail families most often not on approval but on fit: the absentee who bought a residence-heavy route, the relocator who bought an absentee product. Match the instrument to the life, and the rest is paperwork.
The interaction between programmes deserves more attention than it gets: a Caribbean passport changes how a golden-visa application reads (stronger travel profile), an EU residence changes how banks treat your Caribbean citizenship (established footprint), and a deliberate tax residence makes every other document in your life easier to explain. Portfolios compound; single purchases just sit there.