Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Quick answer: Citizenship by descent (jure sanguinis) lets you claim a nationality your ancestors held — often with no residence, investment or language requirement. Italy, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, Germany, Portugal (Sephardic route closed 2024) and others recognise claims through parents, grandparents or further back.
Millions of people hold unexercised rights to a second passport through ancestry. We trace the line, secure the archival proof, and manage the claim — often delivering an EU passport for a fraction of any investment programme’s cost.

Clients engage us for three reasons: depth (200+ programme guides and proprietary indexes maintained in-house), independence (advice driven by your objectives, not programme commissions), and execution (authorised submission channels and bank-grade document preparation in every jurisdiction we serve).

Ireland (grandparent rule via Foreign Births Register) and Italy (no generational limit through the male line pre-1948; courts handle maternal-line cases) are the most claimed; Poland and Hungary suit Central European ancestry.
Ireland: ~9–18 months. Italy: 1–4 years depending on consulate vs court route. Poland: 1–2 years. Archival research adds time where records are scattered.
Typically US$3,000–US$15,000 all-in for research, documents and filing — the best value route to an EU passport where eligibility exists.
Secondary evidence — ship manifests, census entries, military and parish records — can rebuild the chain; our researchers specialise in difficult archives.
Get a confidential, no-obligation assessment of your eligibility, budget and timeline from our investment migration specialists.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “FAQPage”, “mainEntity”: [{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Which countries offer the easiest descent claims?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Ireland (grandparent rule via Foreign Births Register) and Italy (no generational limit through the male line pre-1948; courts handle maternal-line cases) are the most claimed; Poland and Hungary suit Central European ancestry.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How long does citizenship by descent take?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Ireland: ~9u201318 months. Italy: 1u20134 years depending on consulate vs court route. Poland: 1u20132 years. Archival research adds time where records are scattered.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What does it cost?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Typically US$3,000u2013US$15,000 all-in for research, documents and filing u2014 the best value route to an EU passport where eligibility exists.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What if records were destroyed?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Secondary evidence u2014 ship manifests, census entries, military and parish records u2014 can rebuild the chain; our researchers specialise in difficult archives.”}}]}{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “BreadcrumbList”, “itemListElement”: [{“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 1, “name”: “Home”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/”}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 2, “name”: “Citizenship by Descent: Claim Your Ancestral Passport”, “item”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com/citizenship-by-descent/”}]}{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “Service”, “name”: “Citizenship by Descent: Claim Your Ancestral Passport”, “provider”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “Global Citizenship HQ”, “url”: “https://globalcitizenshiphq.com”}, “areaServed”: “Worldwide”, “serviceType”: “citizenship by descent”}
The reference section below extends this article with the market-wide data, costs, process and answers our readers ask for most — maintained by the Global Citizenship HQ research desk and updated as programmes change.
One pattern from a decade of client files deserves emphasis: preparation time is the only variable applicants fully control. Government queues are what they are; document assembly, source-of-funds evidence and name-consistency work happen entirely on your side of the table. Files that invest six careful weeks before submission routinely finish months ahead of files that rushed to file and then fed deficiency letters for a year.
Whatever route this article points you toward, the cost anatomy is consistent across the industry — and the headline figure is never the whole story:
| Cost component | Typical range | When paid | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government contribution / investment | US$90,000–US$800,000+ | After approval-in-principle | The headline figure; donation is consumed, property/bonds recoverable |
| Due diligence fees | US$7,500–US$15,000 per adult | At filing | Non-refundable; funds international background checks |
| Government processing fees | US$250–US$10,000 per person | At filing / approval | Varies sharply by programme and dependent count |
| Professional / legal fees | US$15,000–US$50,000 per family | Staged | File preparation, compliance, submission, post-approval support |
| Document costs | US$1,000–US$5,000 | Preparation phase | Apostilles, sworn translations, police certificates, courier |
| Passport & certificate fees | US$350–US$1,500 per person | After approval | Biometrics, issuance, oath administration where applicable |
| Property transaction costs (if applicable) | 4–10% of price | At closing | Transfer taxes, registration, agent commissions |
Rule of thumb across the industry: budget 15–25% above the headline contribution for a realistic all-in figure, and require an itemised fee schedule in writing before engaging any advisor.
From first consultation to passport or permit in hand, well-run applications follow a predictable arc:
Zoom out once before deciding anything: second citizenships and residence permits are decade-scale assets. Programme details will shift — prices ratchet upward, routes open and close, requirements tighten — but the strategic logic holds: jurisdictional diversification, acquired early and maintained compliantly, has outperformed waiting in every year this industry has existed.
Every application in this field runs on the same documentary spine — assembled early, it is the single biggest determinant of your timeline:
The preparation standard that separates fast files from stalled ones: every name, date and address rendered identically across every document, validity windows mapped so nothing expires mid-process, and certified translations from recognised translators only.
Context worth holding while you compare options: investment migration is a treaty product. A passport’s value lives in the visa-waiver agreements behind it, and those agreements survive only where screening is credible. The programmes covered across our guides maintain their access precisely because refusals are real, interviews are standard, and information flows to partner governments — inconvenient for fraudsters, invaluable for legitimate families.
To place the topic above in market context, here is the current landscape at a glance — figures verified against official programme publications for 2026:
| Program | Minimum investment | Timeline | Visa-free access | Residence req. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Kitts & Nevis | US$250,000 (SISC donation) or US$325,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈150 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Dominica | US$200,000 (EDF donation) or US$200,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈143 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Grenada | US$235,000 (NTF donation) or US$270,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈146 incl. China; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Antigua & Barbuda | US$230,000 (NDF, family of 4) | 4–6 months | ≈147 destinations | 5 days in 5 years |
| St Lucia | US$240,000 donation or US$300,000 bond | 4–8 months | ≈145 destinations | None |
| Türkiye | US$400,000 real estate or US$500,000 deposit | 4–8 months | ≈110; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Vanuatu | US$130,000 (DSP) | 2–3 months | ≈95 (EU access suspended) | None |
| Egypt | US$250,000 donation | 6–12 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Nauru | US$105,000 contribution | 3–4 months | ≈89 destinations | None |
| São Tomé & Príncipe | ≈US$90,000 contribution | 4–6 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Cambodia | US$245,000 donation / US$305,000 investment | 3–6 months | ≈54 destinations | None |
| Jordan | US$750,000+ investment | 6–9 months | ≈55 destinations | None |
A note on how we work: independent of any single programme, authorised through licensed channels in every jurisdiction we serve, and structured so that our compliance review happens before government fees are spent — not after a refusal. Bring us the hardest version of your question; that is what the free consultation is for.
On evidence standards: everything quantitative in this article traces to official programme publications, government fee schedules and primary legislation, reviewed after each legislative season. Where programmes change faster than publication cycles — and in this market they do — the direction of error is flagged rather than smoothed over.
| Mobility tier | Representative passports | Approx. visa-free reach | How investors access the tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Global elite | Singapore, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Spain | 190–195 destinations | Naturalisation after residence programmes (Portugal 5 yrs is the engineered path) or ancestry claims |
| Tier 2 — Strong Western | UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand | 184–189 | Skilled migration, EB-5 (US$800k), NZ Active Investor Plus, then naturalisation |
| Tier 3 — Premium CBI | St Kitts & Nevis, Antigua, Grenada, St Lucia, Dominica | 143–150 incl. Schengen & UK | Direct purchase: US$200,000–250,000, 4–6 months |
| Tier 4 — Regional powers | Türkiye, and rising climbers like the UAE | 110–183 | Türkiye US$400k CBI; UAE citizenship not sold — 10-yr Golden Visa instead |
| Tier 5 — Budget documents | Vanuatu, Nauru, São Tomé, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan | 54–95 | US$90,000–250,000; plan-B and regional value, not Europe access |
The tier logic explains most pricing in this industry: you are buying treaty networks. Moving up one tier is what the investment actually purchases; comparing programmes within a tier is where family policy, speed and route options decide.
The pace of change is itself a planning input. Recent seasons alone delivered:
None of these changes stripped status from anyone who already held it. All of them repriced or restricted what later applicants could buy — the asymmetry that defines timing in this field.
A decision framework that resolves most cases in one sitting: start from the outcome, not the programme. If you need a stronger passport within a year, direct citizenship by investment is the only product that delivers — shortlist by your actual destinations, then by family policy, then by route economics. If your goal is an eventual EU passport, buy the residence programme whose naturalisation clock you will genuinely satisfy — Portugal for minimal presence, Greece for property-led patience. If the objective is tax, choose the residence jurisdiction first (UAE, Italy’s flat tax, Greece’s non-dom, territorial systems) and let citizenship ride separately.
Then run the constraint check: dual-citizenship legality for your current nationality, military-service exposure for sons, source-of-funds documentability, and the honest presence question — how many days will your life actually allow where? Programmes fail families most often not on approval but on fit: the absentee who bought a residence-heavy route, the relocator who bought an absentee product. Match the instrument to the life, and the rest is paperwork.
It helps to remember what these statuses are legally: citizenship is a relationship with a state that survives governments, marriages and market cycles; residence is a renewable licence with conditions. Both are valuable; only one is permanent. Pricing that difference correctly — rather than by sticker — is the core skill of this field.