Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM

The twin claims of the former Czechoslovakia: Czech citizenship by declaration (the 2019 liberalisation) and Slovakia's 2022 descent opening

The twin claims of the former Czechoslovakia: Czech citizenship by declaration (the 2019 liberalisation) and Slovakia’s 2022 descent opening — two successor states, two distinct routes into the EU for the Czechoslovak diaspora’s descendants.
The Czech route: the 2019 amendment (§31 of the Citizenship Act) lets descendants of former Czechoslovak citizens who lost citizenship through emigration and naturalisation abroad (the 1948–1989 exodus’s classic loss events) reclaim by DECLARATION — grandchildren of the emigré generation included, no language test, no residence, dual citizenship fully permitted since 2014. One of the EU’s cleanest reclaim procedures: prove the chain, declare, receive.
The Slovak route: the 2022 amendment opened citizenship to descendants (children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren) of Slovak-born former citizens — with a Slovak residence-permit step and supporting-documents architecture that makes it procedurally heavier than the Czech declaration, but generationally WIDER (three generations against the Czech two). The Slovak diaspora in the US (the great pre-WWI emigration) is the intended audience.
The successor-state chess: families from the former federation often qualify under EITHER law depending on the ancestor’s birthplace and the loss event’s timing — Czech-born ancestor plus post-1948 flight = Czech declaration; Slovak-born plus any-era emigration = Slovak route; some trees offer both, and the passports are functionally equal (EU, Schengen, strong mobility). Choose by procedure, not prestige: the Czech declaration is faster where it fits.
The files: Czechoslovak-era documents (birth records from the regional archives, emigration-era passports, naturalisation certificates abroad establishing the loss event), the descent chain, apostilles and certified translations. Processing: months (Czech declaration) to 1–2 years (Slovak). The strategic note closing this pair: both liberalisations are POLICY, not constitutional right — the Italy lesson applies, and the documented-but-unfiled claim is the only one that can still lose its window.
Explore further: CBI guide · Golden visas · FAQ hub · Site directory.
Free, confidential assessment from our investment migration specialists.
The reference section below extends this article with the market-wide data, costs, process and answers our readers ask for most — maintained by the Global Citizenship HQ research desk and updated as programmes change.
A planning principle that applies across every scenario above: sequence beats selection. The families with the best outcomes rarely found secret programmes — they executed ordinary ones in the right order: fast citizenship for immediate optionality, residence permits matched to actual living intentions, tax residency moved deliberately before liquidity events, and every dependent included at the cheapest possible moment.

From first consultation to passport or permit in hand, well-run applications follow a predictable arc:
Every application in this field runs on the same documentary spine — assembled early, it is the single biggest determinant of your timeline:
The preparation standard that separates fast files from stalled ones: every name, date and address rendered identically across every document, validity windows mapped so nothing expires mid-process, and certified translations from recognised translators only.
The independence note that shapes our coverage: Global Citizenship HQ maintains programme data from primary sources — statutes, government gazettes and official fee schedules — and updates after every legislative change. Rankings and comparisons follow published methodology; where commercial relationships exist with programmes or developers, they never alter an editorial conclusion.

To place the topic above in market context, here is the current landscape at a glance — figures verified against official programme publications for 2026:
| Program | Minimum investment | Timeline | Visa-free access | Residence req. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Kitts & Nevis | US$250,000 (SISC donation) or US$325,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈150 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Dominica | US$200,000 (EDF donation) or US$200,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈143 destinations incl. Schengen & UK | None |
| Grenada | US$235,000 (NTF donation) or US$270,000+ real estate | 4–6 months | ≈146 incl. China; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Antigua & Barbuda | US$230,000 (NDF, family of 4) | 4–6 months | ≈147 destinations | 5 days in 5 years |
| St Lucia | US$240,000 donation or US$300,000 bond | 4–8 months | ≈145 destinations | None |
| Türkiye | US$400,000 real estate or US$500,000 deposit | 4–8 months | ≈110; US E-2 treaty | None |
| Vanuatu | US$130,000 (DSP) | 2–3 months | ≈95 (EU access suspended) | None |
| Egypt | US$250,000 donation | 6–12 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Nauru | US$105,000 contribution | 3–4 months | ≈89 destinations | None |
| São Tomé & Príncipe | ≈US$90,000 contribution | 4–6 months | ≈70 destinations | None |
| Cambodia | US$245,000 donation / US$305,000 investment | 3–6 months | ≈54 destinations | None |
| Jordan | US$750,000+ investment | 6–9 months | ≈55 destinations | None |
The regulatory backdrop matters to every decision on this page: since the 2024 Caribbean MOU established shared due-diligence standards and a US$200,000 price floor, and the European Court of Justice ended intra-EU citizenship sales in 2025, the market has consolidated around fewer, better-governed programmes. That consolidation is the buyer’s friend — surviving programmes defend their treaties vigorously because their entire value depends on them.
Whatever route this article points you toward, the cost anatomy is consistent across the industry — and the headline figure is never the whole story:
| Cost component | Typical range | When paid | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government contribution / investment | US$90,000–US$800,000+ | After approval-in-principle | The headline figure; donation is consumed, property/bonds recoverable |
| Due diligence fees | US$7,500–US$15,000 per adult | At filing | Non-refundable; funds international background checks |
| Government processing fees | US$250–US$10,000 per person | At filing / approval | Varies sharply by programme and dependent count |
| Professional / legal fees | US$15,000–US$50,000 per family | Staged | File preparation, compliance, submission, post-approval support |
| Document costs | US$1,000–US$5,000 | Preparation phase | Apostilles, sworn translations, police certificates, courier |
| Passport & certificate fees | US$350–US$1,500 per person | After approval | Biometrics, issuance, oath administration where applicable |
| Property transaction costs (if applicable) | 4–10% of price | At closing | Transfer taxes, registration, agent commissions |
Rule of thumb across the industry: budget 15–25% above the headline contribution for a realistic all-in figure, and require an itemised fee schedule in writing before engaging any advisor.
All CBI states permit it; the question is your current nationality. Most Western, African and Latin American states allow dual citizenship freely; India, China, Japan, Singapore and Saudi Arabia prohibit or heavily restrict it; South Africa requires prior retention approval. Verify your combination before committing — sequencing mistakes are irreversible.
Preparation typically consumes 4–8 weeks before filing; government processing then runs 2–3 months (Vanuatu), 4–6 months (Caribbean core) or 4–8 months (Türkiye). The applicant controls the largest variable — document readiness — which is why prepared files consistently land at the fast end of published ranges.
Take the headline contribution and add 15–25%: due diligence at US$7,500–15,000 per adult, government processing fees, professional fees, document legalisation and passport issuance. A single applicant on a US$200,000 donation typically completes around US$240,000–255,000 all-in; families scale with per-dependent fees rather than multiples of the base.
Yes — citizenship includes the unrestricted right to reside. Most investors never move, but the option is real: St Kitts and Antigua offer the strongest infrastructure and connectivity, Grenada authentic island life with hurricane-belt advantages, Dominica unmatched nature. Programme economics are similar enough that lifestyle can be the tiebreaker.
Visa-free passports get the Schengen 90/180-day allowance. A national residence permit (Greek or Portuguese golden visa) removes the limit for its issuing country entirely — unlimited presence there, plus the standard allowance across the rest of Schengen. Families wanting European lives buy the permit; travellers manage the count.
Turning research into an outcome: Global Citizenship HQ manages the full journey — strategy, document architecture, source-of-funds preparation, authorised filing, interview readiness and post-approval compliance. Families we advise typically move from first call to submitted application inside eight weeks.
The interaction between programmes deserves more attention than it gets: a Caribbean passport changes how a golden-visa application reads (stronger travel profile), an EU residence changes how banks treat your Caribbean citizenship (established footprint), and a deliberate tax residence makes every other document in your life easier to explain. Portfolios compound; single purchases just sit there.
The pace of change is itself a planning input. Recent seasons alone delivered:
None of these changes stripped status from anyone who already held it. All of them repriced or restricted what later applicants could buy — the asymmetry that defines timing in this field.
A decision framework that resolves most cases in one sitting: start from the outcome, not the programme. If you need a stronger passport within a year, direct citizenship by investment is the only product that delivers — shortlist by your actual destinations, then by family policy, then by route economics. If your goal is an eventual EU passport, buy the residence programme whose naturalisation clock you will genuinely satisfy — Portugal for minimal presence, Greece for property-led patience. If the objective is tax, choose the residence jurisdiction first (UAE, Italy’s flat tax, Greece’s non-dom, territorial systems) and let citizenship ride separately.
Then run the constraint check: dual-citizenship legality for your current nationality, military-service exposure for sons, source-of-funds documentability, and the honest presence question — how many days will your life actually allow where? Programmes fail families most often not on approval but on fit: the absentee who bought a residence-heavy route, the relocator who bought an absentee product. Match the instrument to the life, and the rest is paperwork.
| Mobility tier | Representative passports | Approx. visa-free reach | How investors access the tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Global elite | Singapore, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Spain | 190–195 destinations | Naturalisation after residence programmes (Portugal 5 yrs is the engineered path) or ancestry claims |
| Tier 2 — Strong Western | UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand | 184–189 | Skilled migration, EB-5 (US$800k), NZ Active Investor Plus, then naturalisation |
| Tier 3 — Premium CBI | St Kitts & Nevis, Antigua, Grenada, St Lucia, Dominica | 143–150 incl. Schengen & UK | Direct purchase: US$200,000–250,000, 4–6 months |
| Tier 4 — Regional powers | Türkiye, and rising climbers like the UAE | 110–183 | Türkiye US$400k CBI; UAE citizenship not sold — 10-yr Golden Visa instead |
| Tier 5 — Budget documents | Vanuatu, Nauru, São Tomé, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan | 54–95 | US$90,000–250,000; plan-B and regional value, not Europe access |
The tier logic explains most pricing in this industry: you are buying treaty networks. Moving up one tier is what the investment actually purchases; comparing programmes within a tier is where family policy, speed and route options decide.
Reading across the whole market rather than one programme at a time changes conclusions surprisingly often. Families who arrive certain they want a specific passport frequently leave with a two-instrument structure — a fast citizenship for permanence and a residence permit for lifestyle — because the combined cost of the right pair often undercuts forcing one product to do both jobs badly.